The tech field places a lot of emphasis on version control systems. They are vital for tracking code tweaks, team collaborations, and project workflows. GitLab and GitHub offer very similar services and support features. There is not much to separate these two solutions when it comes to high-level features. Essentially, both platforms offer the same list of services and features.
Want to build better products with user feedback
GitLab, with a per-user cost and lots more features, suits larger teams or businesses needing advanced DevOps tools better. Tools like issue tracking and Pull Requests are at hand within this main structure. This lets users handle their projects without leaving the codebase. GitHub is ideal for those who cherish simplicity in their coding projects.
Security automation and governance at every step
Essentially, the DevOps pipeline is supported via merge requests where developers can track the status of development, testing, and software delivery. From planning to monitoring, GitLab covers the entire DevOps lifecycle. GitLab and GitHub are both excellent, widely used platforms for hosting source code. They gitlab vs github also both offer features designed to provide CI/CD, project management, and security functionality, although GitLab’s product suite is broader and deeper in this respect. Overall, GitLab may be a better choice for large enterprises that want to centralize development operations using a single platform.
GitLab vs. GitHub: Comparing the Leading Code Repository Platforms
In GitHub, you can also categorize issues, pull requests, and notes into specific projects. Beyond that, you can set and track milestones and gauge productivity with various charts and reports. Both platforms include built-in collaboration and code review tools. GitLab came later; Ukrainian developers Dmitriy Zaporozhets and Valery Sizov created GitLab in 2011. From day one, GitLab was designed to be a set of collaboration tools as well as a code repository service.
- GitLab Ultimate plan comes with 8+ scan types and many other governance features out of the box.
- You will also need to pay for additional 3rd party scanners for things like DAST, license compliance, container scanning, IaC scanning to plugin and maintain in GitHub.
- Version control systems (VCS) are essential in software development, managing changes in source code.
- While GitLab and GitHub are very similar solutions, there are differences you should consider.
Github’s UI is far more advanced, and they offer some custom features (e.g. Releases). Although GitHub is currently the most popular platform for developers, it’s not really accurate to say that GitHub offers any more or less support for developers than GitLab does. The two platforms are also comparable with regard to their ease of use.
It used to support Mercurial, but it stopped in 2020 due to the steady decline of Mercurial usage among Bitbucket users. When we talk about version control systems (VCS), there are two types available – Centralized VCS (CVCS) and Distributed VCS (DVCS). But, this might need effort and careful thought of potential effects on projects that are ongoing. GitLab allows self-hosting, useful for those wanting more power over data and infrastructure. GitLab, on the other hand, is a bit trickier yet still easy to use.
The number of private repositories is unlimited in both cases, but each limits the number of collaborators that are permitted for free, raising the limit based on paid tier thereafter. Nothing about security was mentioned in this post which is a major part of both platforms. Versions, GitHub needs Advanced Security as an add-on option of $49/month which only includes a select few scan types and brings the cost to $68/month. Higher priority support is also not included and is another add-on which comes with GitLab. You will then need to pay for additional 3rd party scanners for things like DAST, license compliance, container scanning, IaC scanning, ect.
Meanwhile, DVCS supports multiple repositories, allowing developers to have their own local repositories and work autonomously. But, GitLab’s wide-ranging features and flexible pricing might benefit large teams or those needing advanced DevOps abilities more. GitLab, an open-source platform, has its strength in customization, making it appealing for users after self-hosting capabilities. At Github , by default, you do not have any private repos ( ones only you and your team can access ). As a part of the Atlassian suite of products, Bitbucket shares many features with both GitLab and GitHub, including a self-hosted option. Thanks to the Atlassian ecosystem, Bitbucket is able to leverage capabilities from Jira, Bamboo, Opsgenie, Statuspage, and more to support the full DevOps life cycle.
Git is an open source distributed version control system (DVCS) that allows developers to work on the same project from anywhere and even if they’re offline. GitHub, GitLab and their alternatives are cloud services https://traderoom.info/ that provide remote hosting of Git repositories, as well as features such as task management, wikis, CI and more. GitLab also offers comprehensive project management tools, including issue tracking and boards.
When thinking about moving to GitLab or GitHub, you should also consider the setup costs and resources needed for getting started. In that regard, the topic of available import and export features is pretty important. In the last few years, there’s been much debate about GitLab vs GitHub, as they positioned themselves as handy assistants for developers, particularly when working in large teams. You will be able to see what your developers are working on, and they can create a label to describe any issues they are having with the project.